International Institute of Dharma

Just as religious institutions like Churches & Churchianity, Mullah's Islam, and extremist groups use powerful narratives to manipulate followers, brainwashing can be deeply embedded in belief systems through social media and cyberspace. These entities often rely on intense indoctrination, selective teachings, and emotional manipulation to reinforce ideologies, suppress critical thinking, and create unwavering loyalty. Whether it's fear, guilt, or promises of salvation, these groups manipulate followers into accepting a singular, distorted reality. Terrorist organisations, similarly, prey on vulnerable minds, using violent ideologies and propaganda spread via technologies to shape individuals' thoughts and actions. This process is not always overt—subtle, persistent reinforcement through media, religious sermons, and online platforms can gradually erode independent thought, leading individuals to internalise ideas that were not originally their own. Brainwashing is a gradual yet powerful force, reshaping beliefs and behaviours to align with external control.

"Vaping is Safer than Smoking" (Misleading Marketing by E-Cigarette Companies):
Many e-cigarette companies have promoted vaping as a safer alternative to smoking despite growing evidence of health risks. This messaging led many young people and smokers to believe vaping was harmless, contributing to an increase in e-cigarette use and health concerns, particularly among teenagers. 

lt-like Religious Indoctrination (e.g., Jonestown Massacre): Jim Jones's People's Temple in the 1970s used psychological manipulation, fear tactics, and promises of salvation to control followers. This culminated in the tragic mass suicide of over 900 people in 1978, showing the power of brainwashing in cults.

N Propaganda: North Korea's regime uses state-controlled media and indoctrination in schools and daily life to brainwash citizens into loyalty to Kim Jong-un. The government isolates the population from outside information and presents a distorted worldview, ensuring total control.

Terrorists (ISIS): ISIS has used social media, videos, and radical sermons to brainwash vulnerable individuals, especially young people, into joining violent jihad. By manipulating emotions and promising a sense of purpose, they lure individuals into extremist ideologies.

"Clean Eating" Extreme: Some wellness movements and influencers promote extreme versions of "clean eating," leading followers to develop unhealthy obsessions with food purity and body image. This form of brainwashing often convinces people to reject balanced diets in favour of restrictive and unhealthy eating habits.

Facebook/Instagram Algorithmic Manipulation: Facebook and Instagram use algorithms prioritising sensational or emotionally engaging content. These algorithms often reinforce users' existing beliefs and create echo chambers. This manipulation can lead to polarisation and confirmation bias, limiting exposure to differing viewpoints.

Google's Search Result Manipulation: Google's search algorithms, influenced by SEO practices, can shape what users see by promoting biased or selective content. This can limit access to diverse perspectives, subtly brainwashing users by presenting certain narratives as authoritative. 

ChatGPT's Inbuilt Biases: Like other AI models, ChatGPT is trained on vast datasets from the Internet, which can include biases present in human-created content. These biases can be reflected in its responses, such as favouring specific cultural perspectives, reinforcing stereotypes, or providing incomplete or skewed information on sensitive topics. Despite efforts to reduce such biases, the AI can unintentionally mirror societal and cultural biases due to the nature of its training data. 

Recycling is a Myth: Many companies promote recycling as a solution while generating vast amounts of waste. Amazon, for instance, is estimated to create over 465 million packages of waste (never used, new items) annually, with much of it non-recyclable or difficult to process. Similarly, fast fashion brands like H&M and Nike push eco-friendly initiatives while contributing to over 92 million tons of textile waste globally annually. H&M despite pledging to use more sustainable materials, H&M continues to generate massive waste through its "fast-fashion" model. At the same time, Nike's shoe production also results in millions of shoes ending up in landfills annually. These companies focus on consumer recycling efforts while neglecting their massive environmental footprints.